I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Series C
30.10.2023
(Case T-547/23)
(C/2023/347)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Redbeet Interactive AB (Skövde, Sweden) (represented by: K. von Seydlitz-Brandl, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Treastone Ltd (London, United Kingdom)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark RAFT — European Union trade mark No 18 034 606
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 June 2023 in Case R 1217/2022-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Redbeet;
—order Treastone to bear the costs of the proceedings including those incurred by Redbeet, in case Treastone should become an intervening party in this case.
—Infringement of Article 60(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Potential violation of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/347/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)