- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-1032/23: Action brought on 16 October 2023 — Airbnb v EUIPO — Airtasker (AIRBNB)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN1032
62023TN1032
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
Series C
C/2023/991
27.11.2023
(Case T-1032/23)
(C/2023/991)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Airbnb, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Airtasker Pty Ltd (Sydney, Australia)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark AIRBNB — European Union trade mark No 11 933 611
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 August 2023 in joined cases R 885/2022-2 and R 894/2022-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision, insofar as it rejected its appeal in case R 894/2022-2;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/991/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
* * *
Language of the case: English