I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-81/15)(1)
((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark Synthesis - Absence of genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court))
(2016/C 191/35)
Language of the case: Italian
Applicant: Danila Facchinello (Molinella, Italy) (represented by: F. Torlontano, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Olimpia Splendid Spa (Gualtieri, Italy) (represented by: A. Ferrarese and G. Ferrarese, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 November 2014 (Case R 2169/2013-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Olimpia Splendid SpA and Ms Danila Facchinello.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Ms Danila Facchinello to pay the costs.
OJ C 118, 13.4.2015.