I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community word mark Fitcoin – Earlier national, international and Community figurative marks coin – Relative ground for refusal – Relevant public – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 26)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 April 2008 (Case R 1429/2007‑1), relating to opposition proceedings between Coin SpA and Dynamiki Zoi AE.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Dynamiki Zoi AE
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark Fitcoin for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 35, 36 and 41 – Application No 3725298
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
Italian trade mark coin, Registration No 160126, for goods in Class 25; Italian trade mark coin, Registration No 253233, for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 35, 36 and 41; Italian trade mark coin, Registration No 240305, for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 35, 36 and 41; Italian trade mark coin, Registration No 169548, for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 35, 36 and 41, extended to Benelux, France, Hungary, Austria and Portugal; Italian trade mark coin, Registration No 240286, for goods and services in Class 25, extended to Benelux, France, Hungary and Austria; Community trade mark coin, Registration No 109827, for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28 and 35; international trade mark coin, Registration No R 381015, for goods and services in Classes 16, 25, 28, 35, 36 and 41, extended to Benelux, Germany, Spain, France, Hungary, Austria, Portugal and Slovenia
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition dismissed in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 15 April 2008 (Case R 1429/2007‑1);
2.Orders OHIM to pay the costs.