- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-350/23: Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2025 – Kargins v Commission (Non-contractual liability – State aid – Intervention of the Commission as amicus curiae before a national court – Unlawfulness of the conduct alleged against the EU institution – Plea of illegality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Article 29(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 – Principles of separation of powers, independence of national courts, right to an effective remedy, impartiality and neutrality)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TA0350
62023TA0350
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2375
28.4.2025
(Case T-350/23)
(Non-contractual liability - State aid - Intervention of the Commission as amicus curiae before a national court - Unlawfulness of the conduct alleged against the EU institution - Plea of illegality - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals - Article 29(2) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 - Principles of separation of powers, independence of national courts, right to an effective remedy, impartiality and neutrality)
(C/2025/2375)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Rems Kargins (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A.-L. Meyer and A. Jensen, acting as Agents)
Re:
By his action based on Article 268 TFEU and the second paragraph of Article 340 TFEU, the applicant seeks compensation for the damage which he claims to have suffered as a result of the European Commission’s alleged unlawful conduct, on account of the Commission’s intervention as amicus curiae in proceedings between Mr Kargins and a third company before the Augstākā tiesa (Supreme Court, Latvia).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders Mr Rems Kargins to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C 338, 25.9.2023.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2375/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—