- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-606/24, Ministerul Finanțelor: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 17 September 2024 – XY and Others v Ministerul Finanțelor
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0606
62024CN0606
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/1402
10.3.2025
(Case C-606/24, Ministerul Finanțelor)
(C/2025/1402)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: XY and Others
Defendant: Ministerul Finanțelor
Question referred
Is the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU (read in conjunction with Article 2 TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights) to be interpreted as meaning that the principle of the independence of judges precludes national legislation introducing an obligation for adjudicating panels, which hear and determine cases concerning the establishment and/or payment of the salary entitlements or salary-related entitlements of staff paid from public funds, to request that the Înalta Curte de Casație şi Justiție (High Court of Cassation and Justice), in all cases which they are called to decide, give a preliminary ruling on points of law not previously dealt with by that court, thereby diminishing the ability of the judges hearing the cases in question to decide those cases independently, solely on the ground that inconsistent judicial practice may have a negative impact on the consolidated general budget and the socio-economic stability of the country?
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/1402/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: Romanian.