- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-732/20: Judgment of the General Court of 13 October 2021 — Freundlieb v EUIPO (CRYSTAL) (EU trade mark — EU word mark CRYSTAL — Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration — Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration — Application for restitutio in integrum — Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty of care — No review — Failure to comply with time limits)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0732
62020TA0732
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.12.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 490/41
(Case T-732/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - EU word mark CRYSTAL - Failure to apply for renewal of the trade mark registration - Revocation of the trade mark on expiry of the registration - Application for restitutio in integrum - Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Duty of care - No review - Failure to comply with time limits)
(2021/C 490/48)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Andreas Freundlieb (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: J. Vogtmeier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 October 2020 (Case R 1056/2020-5), relating to an application for restitutio in integrum in relation to the right to apply for renewal of the EU word mark CRYSTAL.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Andreas Freundlieb to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(*)
Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140
* * *