- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-315/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Yayla Türk v EUIPO — Marmara Import-Export (Sütat) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Sütat — Absolute ground for invalidity — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TA0315
62022TA0315
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.9.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 338/21
(Case T-315/22) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Sütat - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Right to be heard)
(2023/C 338/27)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Yayla Türk Lebensmittelvertrieb GmbH (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Marmara Import-Export GmbH (Ratingen, Germany) (represented by: T. Moll, lawyer)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 March 2022 (Case R 1184/2021-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Yayla Türk Lebensmittelvertrieb GmbH to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
OJ C 276, 18.7.2022.