I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-87/23, Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija)
(2023/C 173/27)
Language of the case: Latvian
Applicant: Biedrība ‘Latvijas Informācijas un komunikācijas tehnoloģijas asociācija’
Defendant: Valsts ieņēmumu dienests
(1)Must Article 9(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) be interpreted as meaning that a not-for-profit organisation whose activity is aimed at implementing State aid schemes financed by the European Regional Development Fund is to be treated as a taxable person who carries out an economic activity?
(2)Must Article 28 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax be interpreted as meaning that an association which does not actually supply training services is nevertheless to be equated with a supplier of services where the services were acquired from another economic operator in order to ensure the implementation of a State aid project financed by the European Regional Development Fund?
(3)Pursuant to Article 73 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, if a supplier of services receives only partial consideration from the recipient of the service for the service supplied (30 %) but the remaining cost of the service is covered by an aid payment from the European Regional Development Fund, is the taxable consideration the total amount received by the supplier of services from both the recipient of the service and a third party in the form of an aid payment?
Language of the case: Latvian.
(1) OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.