EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court of 12 March 1980. # Sonacotra v Ahmed Belaid. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Tribunal d'instance de Hayange - France. # Case 68/80.

ECLI:EU:C:1980:76

61980CO0068

March 12, 1980
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61980O0068

European Court reports 1980 Page 00771

Parties

IN CASE 68/80

REFERENCE FOR A PRELIMINARY RULING BY THE ACTING JUDGE AT THE TRIBUNAL D ' INSTANCE , HAYANGE

Grounds

BY DECISION DATED 25 FEBRUARY 1980 THE ACTING JUDGE AT THE TRIBUNAL D ' INSTANCE , HAYANGE , REFERRED TO THE COURT , PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 177 OF THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EEC , A JUDGMENT WHICH RAISES , IN THE CONTEXT OF AN ACTION FOR THE EVICTION OF TENANTS , THE QUESTION WHETHER AN ACTION AGAINST THE SAID JUDGE FOR DAMAGES FOR A DENIAL OF JUSTICE IS COMPATIBLE WITH ' ' THE REQUIREMENTS INHERENT IN THE VERY NATURE OF COMMUNITY LAW APPLICABLE TO THIS CASE ' ' .

IT IS APPARENT FROM THE GROUNDS AND WORDING OF THE DECISION MAKING THE REFERENCE THAT THE FIELD COVERED BY THE QUESTION REFERRED TO THE COURT DOES NOT IN ANY WAY RELATE EITHER TO THE INTERPRETATION OF THE EEC TREATY OR TO THE VALIDITY OR INTERPRETATION OF AN ACT OF A COMMUNITY INSTITUTION .

SINCE THE COURT MAY AT ANY TIME , PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 92 ( 2 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE ( AS AMENDED ON 12 SEPTEMBER 1979 , OFFICIAL JOURNAL , L 238 , P . 1 ), OF ITS OWN MOTION CONSIDER WHETHER THERE EXISTS ANY ABSOLUTE BAR TO PROCEEDING WITH A CASE , IT HEREBY DECLARES THAT IT CLEARLY HAS NO JURISDICTION TO REPLY TO THE QUESTION THUS RAISED .

UPON HEARING THE ADVOCATE GENERAL ,

Operative part

THE COURT ,

COMPOSED OF : H . KUTSCHER , PRESIDENT , A . O ' KEEFFE AND A . TOUFFAIT ( PRESIDENTS OF CHAMBERS ), J . MERTENS DE WILMARS , P . PESCATORE , G . BOSCO AND T . KOOPMANS , JUDGES ,

ADVOCATE GENERAL : F . CAPOTORTI

REGISTRAR : A . VAN HOUTTE

DECIDES AS FOLLOWS :

THE COURT OF JUSTICE CLEARLY HAS NO JURISDICTION TO REPLY TO THE QUESTION REFERRED TO IT BY THE ACTING JUDGE AT THE TRIBUNAL D ' INSTANCE , HAYANGE .

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia