- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-285/11: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Gooré v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire — Withdrawal of the list of persons concerned — Action for annulment — No need to adjudicate — Action for damages — Action manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0285
62011TB0285
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
18.2.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 49/24
(Case T-285/11)(1)
(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Withdrawal of the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate - Action for damages - Action manifestly unfounded)
2012/C 49/44
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Charles Kader Gooré (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) (represented by: F. Meynot, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen, G. Étienne and M. Chavrier, acting as Agents)
Re:
Firstly, annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 10), as regards the applicant’s name and, secondly, an application for damages.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no further need to adjudicate on the application for annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire.
2.The application for damages is dismissed.
3.Each party shall bear its own costs.
4.There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission.
(1)
Language of the case: French.