I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2015/C 171/35)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Unicorn a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mercilink Equipment Leasing Ltd (Limassol, Cyprus)
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark (Representation of a unicorn) – Community trade mark No 11 014 743
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 January 2015 in Case R 149/2014-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—Annul the contested decision;
—Order OHIM to pay the costs.
—OHIM did not properly take into consideration evidence submitted by the applicant;
—OHIM incorrectly considered good reputation of the earlier trademarks.