- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-661/19: Action brought on 27 September 2019 – Sasol Germany and Others v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0661
62019TN0661
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 406/36
—
(Case T-661/19)
(2019/C 406/46)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Sasol Germany GmbH (Hamburg, Germany), SI Group - Béthune (Béthune, France), BASF SE (Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: C. Mereu, P. Sellar and S. Saez Moreno, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—declare the application admissible and well-founded;
—annul the Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1194 of 5 July 2019 on the identification of 4-tert-butylphenol (PTBP) as a substance of very high concern pursuant to Article 57(f) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2019, L 187, p. 41);
—order the defendant to pay the costs of these proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on five pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those raised in Case T-640/19, Sasol Germany and Others v ECHA.
—