EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-798/23, Abbottly: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 21 December 2023 — Minister for Justice v SH

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0798

62023CN0798

December 21, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2024/1845

11.3.2024

(Case C-798/23, Abbottly (*) )

(C/2024/1845)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Minister for Justice

Respondent: SH

Questions referred

1.Where the surrender of the requested person is sought for the purpose of serving a custodial sentence imposed on that person as a result of violating the terms of a sentence of police supervision previously imposed on him, in circumstances where the court that imposed that custodial sentence had a discretion whether to impose a custodial sentence (though no discretion as to the duration of the sentence if imposed), are the proceedings leading to the imposition of that custodial sentence part of the ‘trial resulting in the decision’ for the purposes of Article 4a(l) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (**) ?

2.Was the decision to convert the sentence of police supervision into a custodial sentence in the circumstances set out in (1) above, one that had the purpose or effect of modifying the nature and/or quantum of the sentence previously imposed on the requested person and, in particular, the sentence of police supervision that formed part of his previous sentence, such as to come within the exception referred to in para. 77 of Ardic (***) ?

(*) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any of the parties to the proceedings.

(**) Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States Statements made by certain Member States on the adoption of the Framework Decision (OJ 2002, L 190, p. 1).

(***) Case C-571/17 PPU, Samet Ardic, Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2017, EU:C:2017:1026.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/1845/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia