- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-56/23, Riaman: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 May 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Bistriţa — Romania) — LO v Ministerul Public — Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria Bistriţa, RS, TU and VW (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CB0056
62023CB0056
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.7.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 261/16
(Case C-56/23, (*1) Riaman) (*2)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to present the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2023/C 261/23)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: LO
Interveners: Ministerul Public — Parchetul de pe lângă Judecătoria Bistriţa, RS, TU and VW
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the Judecătoria Bistriţa (Court of First Instance, Bistriţa, Romania), by decision of 7 December 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.
Date lodged: 3.2.2023.
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
* * *
(*1) Language of the case: Romanian.