- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 19 September 2001. # Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs). # Community trade mark - Shape of a product for washing machines or dishwashers - Three-dimensional mark - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. # Case T-335/99.
ECLI:EU:T:2001:219
61999TJ0335
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19 September 2001 (*1)
In Case T-335/99,
Henkel KGaA, established in Düsseldorf (Germany), represented by H.-F. Wissel and C. Osterrieth, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg,
applicant,
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), represented by A. von Mühlendahl, D. Schennen and S. Laitinen, acting as Agents,
defendant,
ACTION brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 September 1999 (Case R-70/1993-3), which was notified to the applicant on 28 September 1999,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (Second Chamber),
composed of: A.W.H. Meij, President, A. Potocki and J. Pirrung, Judges,
Registrar: D. Christensen, Administrator,
having regard to the application lodged at the Registry of the Court on 26 November 1999,
having regard to the response lodged at the Registry of the Court on 17 February 2000,
further to the hearing on 5 April 2001,
gives the following
Judgment (*1)
On those grounds,
THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber),
hereby:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the parties to bear their own costs.
Meij
Potocki
Pirrung
Delivered in open court in Luxembourg on 19 September 2001.
Registrar
President
*1 Language of the case: German.
1 The facts, arguments of the parties and grounds of this judgment are identical or similar to those in the judgment in Case T-337/99 Henkel v OHIM (red and white round tablet) [2001] ECR II-2597, ECR II-2601. The only differences between the judgments are accounted for by the appearance of the three-dimensional trade marks for which registration was sought, namely, in this case, the shape of a rectangular tablet with two layers, one white and the other red.