- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-455/18 P: Appeal brought on 12 July 2018 by Oliver Spieker against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 8 May 2018 in Case T-92/18, Oliver Spieker v European Union Intellectual Property Office
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0455
62018CN0455
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 35/18
—
(Case C-455/18 P)
(2021/C 35/23)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: Oliver Spieker (represented by: A. Schönfleisch, O. Spieker, M. Alber and N. Willich, Rechtsanwälte)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 8 May 2018 in Case T-92/18, Spieker v EUIPO (Science for a better skin), by which the General Court dismissed the action for annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 December 2017 (R 1067/2017-4) which had dismissed the appellant’s appeal against the decision of the EUIPO examiner of 20 March 2017;
—annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 December 2017 (R 1067/2017-4);
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those necessarily incurred by the appellant before the Fourth Board of Appeal and the General Court of the European Union.
By order of 8 December 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the unsuccessful party to pay the costs.
—