I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(C-628/23
AXA Bank Europe and Others)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to set out the regulatory context of the main proceedings - Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of EU law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2024/3732)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Applicants: YG, NI
Defendants: AXA Bank Europe SA, OTP Bank Nyrt., OTP Faktoring Követeléskezelő Zrt.
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Törvényszék (Budapest Regional Court, Hungary), by decision of 21 September 2023, is manifestly inadmissible.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3732/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—