- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-232/15 P: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 April 2016 — ultra air GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office, Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH (Appeal — EU trade mark — EU word mark ultra.air ultrafilter — Invalidity proceedings — Absolute ground for refusal or for invalidity — Descriptive character — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 52(1)(a) — Declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CB0232
62015CB0232
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 279/4
(Case C-232/15 P) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Appeal - EU trade mark - EU word mark ultra.air ultrafilter - Invalidity proceedings - Absolute ground for refusal or for invalidity - Descriptive character - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 52(1)(a) - Declaration of invalidity by the Board of Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))
(2016/C 279/05)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Appellant: ultra air GmbH (represented by: C. König, Rechtsanwalt)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent), Donaldson Filtration Deutschland GmbH (represented by: N. Siebertz and M. Teworte-Vey, Rechtsanwältinnen)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.ultra air GmbH shall pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 262, 10.8.2015