- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-747/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 April 2018 – Vincenti v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Social security — Opinion of the Invalidity Committee — Discretion of Appointing Authority — Articles 53 and 78 of the Staff Regulations — Error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TA0747
62016TA0747
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-747/16) (1)
‛(Civil service — Officials — Social security — Opinion of the Invalidity Committee — Discretion of Appointing Authority — Articles 53 and 78 of the Staff Regulations — Error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons)’
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Guillaume Vincenti (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking annulment of the decision of EUIPO of 18 December 2015 refusing to recognise the applicant’s permanent total incapacity and to declare that he is to be retired.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Guillaume Vincenti to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 14, 16.1.2017.