I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
(C/2024/2323)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Solidexpert Polska sp. z o.o (Krakow, Poland) (represented by: M. Krekora, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark woodexpert — Application for registration No 1 707 311
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 December 2023 in Case R 1788/2023-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it dismissed the appeal and upheld refusal of protection of the international registration woodexpert in relation to the goods in class 9: Computer software applications, downloadable; programs for computers; operating programs; computer programs, downloadable; computer programs, recorded, and services in class 42: Updating of computer software; software as service; duplication of computer programs; engineering services; rental of computer software; interior design; design services for furniture; industrial art design; design services for industrial art design;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court.
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 27(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 in conjunction with Article 42(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Article 70(2) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2323/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)