EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-332/20: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 August 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Roma Multiservizi SpA, Rekeep SpA v Roma Capitale, Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Concession contracts — Formation of a semi-public company — Award to that company of the management of an ‘integrated school service’ — Appointment of the private partner under a tender procedure — Directive 2014/23/EU — Article 38 — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 58 — Applicability — ‘In-house’ criteria — Requirement for minimum participation of the private partner in the capital of the semi-public company — Indirect participation of the contracting authority in the capital of the private partner — Selection criteria)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0332

62020CA0332

August 1, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/5

(Case C-332/20) (*)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Public procurement - Concession contracts - Formation of a semi-public company - Award to that company of the management of an ‘integrated school service’ - Appointment of the private partner under a tender procedure - Directive 2014/23/EU - Article 38 - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 58 - Applicability - ‘In-house’ criteria - Requirement for minimum participation of the private partner in the capital of the semi-public company - Indirect participation of the contracting authority in the capital of the private partner - Selection criteria)

(2022/C 408/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Roma Multiservizi SpA, Rekeep SpA

Defendants: Roma Capitale, Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato

Intervener: Consorzio Nazionale Servizi Soc. coop. (CNS)

Operative part of the judgment

1.Article 58 of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2365 of 18 December 2017 must be interpreted as meaning that a contracting authority may exclude an economic operator from the procedure seeking, first, to form a semi-public company and, second, to award that company a service contract, where that exclusion is justified by the fact that, on the basis of the indirect participation of that contracting authority in that economic operator, the maximum participation of that contracting authority in that company, as determined in the call-for-tenders documents would be, in practice, exceeded if that contracting authority selected that economic operator as its partner, in so far as the excess participation serves to increase the financial uncertainty borne by that contracting authority;

2.Article 38 of Directive 2014/23/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on the award of concession contracts, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/2366 of 18 December 2017 must be interpreted as meaning that a contracting authority may exclude an economic operator from the procedure seeking, first, to form a semi-public company and, second, to award that company a services concession, where that exclusion is justified by the fact that, on the basis of the indirect participation of that contracting authority in that economic operator, the maximum participation of that contracting authority in that company, as determined in the call-for-tenders documents would be, in practice, exceeded if that contracting authority selected that economic operator as its partner, in so far as that excess participation serves to increase the financial uncertainty borne by that contracting authority.

(*)

OJ C 329, 5.10.2020.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia