I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
(C/2025/3550)
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Applicant: Super Brand Licencing (SBG) (Villeurbanne, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and A. Sion, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: VF International Sagl (Stabio, Switzerland)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY EXPEDITION – EU trade mark No 9 860 834
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 March 2025 in Case R 124/2022-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—principally, annul and alter the contested decision to the effect that EU mark No 9 860 834 was not filed in bad faith on 1 April 2011;
—in the alternative, annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3550/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—