- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-188/16: Order of the General Court of 17 December 2019 — repowermap.org v EUIPO — Repower (REPOWER) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Work mark REPOWER — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0188
62016TB0188
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.2.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 61/37
(Case T-188/16) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Work mark REPOWER - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2020/C 61/46)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: repowermap.org (Bern, Switzerland) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Repower AG (Brusio, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Kunz-Hallstein and H. P. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 February 2016 (Case R 2311/2014-5) relating to invalidity proceedings between repowermap.org and Repower.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is ordered to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: French.
* * *
(1) OJ C 222, 20.6.2016.