- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-30/22: Action brought on 18 January 2022 — Sanoptis v EUIPO — Synoptis Pharma (SANOPTIS)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0030
62022TN0030
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.3.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 119/51
(Case T-30/22)
(2022/C 119/73)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Sanoptis Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Rost, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Synoptis Pharma sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SANOPTIS — Application for registration No 17 934 770
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 November 2021 in Case R 850/2021-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant;
—orders the intervener to bear its own costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the failure to state reasons in the contested decision;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.