- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-561/10 P: Order of the Court of 20 September 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (Appeal — Public service contracts — Invitation to tender — Computing services for the maintenance of the SEI-BUD/AMD/CR systems — Rejection of the tender — Inadequate statement of reasons — Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010CB0561
62010CB0561
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.1.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 25/23
(Case C-561/10 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Public service contracts - Invitation to tender - Computing services for the maintenance of the SEI-BUD/AMD/CR systems - Rejection of the tender - Inadequate statement of reasons - Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence)
(2012/C 25/41)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and N. Bambara, acting as Agents)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2010 in Case T-387/08 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission dismissing an application (i) for annulment of the decision of the Publications Office of the European Union of 20 June 2008 rejecting the tender submitted by the appellant in Call for Tender for computing services — maintenance of the SEI-BUD/AMD/CR systems and related services (AO 10185) (OJ 2008/S 43-058884) and of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer, and (ii) for damages.
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE shall pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 72, 5.3.2011.