- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-300/23: Action brought on 30 May 2023 — Dornbracht v EUIPO — Marco Mammoliti (SINQUE)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023TN0300
62023TN0300
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.7.2023
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 252/77
(Case T-300/23)
(2023/C 252/92)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Dornbracht AG & Co. KG (Iserlohn, Germany) (represented by: J. Künzel, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Marco Mammoliti SpA (Aosta, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SINQUE — Application for registration No 18 261 008
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 March 2023 in Case R 1374/2022-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul and alter orders No 1, No 2 and No 3 of the contested decision, thereby rejecting the appeal before the Board of Appeal, upholding the decision of the Opposition Division and rejecting the EUTM application;
—order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs.
Plea in law
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.