- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-518/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 3 August 2022 — J.M.P. v AP Assistenzprofis GmbH
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0518
62022CN0518
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.11.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 424/27
(Case C-518/22)
(2022/C 424/35)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant and appellant on a point of law: J.M.P.
Defendant and respondent in the appeal on a point of law: AP Assistenzprofis GmbH
Question referred
Can Article 4(1), Article 6(1), Article 7 and/or Article 2(5) of Directive 2000/78/EC, (1) read in the light of the requirements of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and of Article 19 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation such as that in the main proceedings, direct discrimination on grounds of age can be justified?
(1) Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).