- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-86/19: Action brought on 15 February 2019 — Solnova v EUIPO — Canina Pharma (BIO-INSECT Shocker)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0086
62019TN0086
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 122/30
(Case T-86/19)
(2019/C 122/34)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Solnova AG (Zollikon, Switzerland) (represented by: P. Lee, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Canina Pharma GmbH (Hamm, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark at issue: Application for EU trade mark BIO-INSECT Shocker — Application for registration No 14 837 553
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 December 2018 in Case R 276/2018-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(f) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.