I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 383/30)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: FTI Touristik GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Parr, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Harald Prantner (Hamburg, Germany) and Daniel Giersch (Monaco, Monaco)
Proprietor of the mark at issue: the other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark at issue: EU figurative mark with the word element ‘Fl’ — Application No 12 201 273
Proceedings before EUIPO: opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 June 2016 in Case R 480/2015-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.