I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-520/12)(<span class="super">1</span>)
((Community trade mark - Application for the Community figurative mark gifflar - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctiveness - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 282/39
Language of the case: Swedish
Applicant: Pågen Trademark AB (Malmö, Sweden) (represented by: J. Norderyd, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Leffler and P. Geroulakos, Agents)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 September 2012 (Case R 46/2012-2), concerning an application for registration of the figurative mark gifflar as a Community trade mark.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Pågen Trademark AB to pay the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 32, 2.2.2013.