- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-431/13: Order of the General Court of 26 February 2015 — Métropole Gestion v OHIM — Metropol (METROPOL) (Community trade mark — Word mark METROPOL — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Failure to apply for renewal of the registration of the mark — Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0431
62013TB0431
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.4.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 138/49
(Case T-431/13)(1)
((Community trade mark - Word mark METROPOL - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Failure to apply for renewal of the registration of the mark - Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration - No need to adjudicate))
(2015/C 138/65)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Métropole Gestion (Paris, France) (represented by: M.-A. Roux Steinkühler, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Metropol Investment Financial Company Ltd (Moscow, Russia)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 June 2013 (Cases affaires R 723/2012-2 and R 845/2012-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Métropole Gestion and Metropol Investment Financial Company Ltd.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Métropole Gestion and the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) shall each bear their own costs.
(1) OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.