- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-230/24: Action brought on 3 May 2024 – TelForceOne v EUIPO – 4Kraft (Wheels for vehicles (except for rail vehicles))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0230
62024TN0230
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/3787
(Case T-230/24)
(C/2024/3787)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: TelForceOne S.A. (Wrocław, Poland) (represented by: M. Mielniczuk-Skibicka, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: 4Kraft sp. z o.o. (Poznań, Poland)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design Wheels for vehicles (except for rail vehicles) – Community design No 6 039 046-0002
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2024 in Case R 677/2023-3
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—in the event of intervention in the proceedings, order the intervener to pay the costs, including those incurred before EUIPO.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 5(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/3787/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—