- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-345/13: Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court (Ireland) made on 24 June 2013 — Karen Millen Fashions Ltd v Dunnes Stores, Dunnes Stores (Limerick) Ltd
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0345
62013CN0345
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.9.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 260/26
(Case C-345/13)
2013/C 260/47
Language of the case: English
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Karen Millen Fashions Ltd
Defendant: Dunnes Stores, Dunnes Stores (Limerick) Ltd
Questions referred
1.In consideration of the individual character of a design which is claimed to be entitled to be protected as an unregistered Community design for the purposes of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12th December, 2001 on Community designs, is the overall impression it produces on the informed user, within the meaning of Article 6 of that Regulation, to be considered by reference to whether it differs from the overall impression produced on such a user by
(a)any individual design which has previously been made available to the public, or
(b)any combination of known design features from more than one such earlier design?
2.Is a Community design court obliged to treat an unregistered Community design as valid for the purposes of Article 85(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12th December, 2001 on Community designs where the right holder merely indicates what constitutes the individual character of the design or is the right holder obliged to prove that the design has individual character in accordance with Article 6 of that Regulation?
Language of the case: English
(1) OJ L 3, p. 1