EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-462/23: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 April 2025 – Commission v Bulgaria (Mineral water) (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Consumer protection – Directive 2009/54/EC – Article 8(2) – Prohibition on marketing natural mineral water from one and the same spring under more than one trade description – Article 7(2)(b) – Article 9(4)(c) – Labelling requirements – Mandatory information – Name of the spring – Incorrect transposition)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0462

62023CA0462

April 3, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/3017

10.6.2025

(Case C-462/23)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Consumer protection - Directive 2009/54/EC - Article 8(2) - Prohibition on marketing natural mineral water from one and the same spring under more than one trade description - Article 7(2)(b) - Article 9(4)(c) - Labelling requirements - Mandatory information - Name of the spring - Incorrect transposition)

(C/2025/3017)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: N. Nikolova and B. Rous Demiri, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Republic of Bulgaria (represented by: T. Mitova, S. Ruseva and R. Stoyanov, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Declares that,

by failing to prohibit the marketing of natural mineral water and spring water from one and the same spring under more than one trade description;

by failing to require that the labels of natural mineral waters and spring waters indicate the name of the spring; and

by allowing the use of the term ‘spring water’ for water that does not satisfy the conditions for using that term;

the Republic of Bulgaria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 8(2), Article 7(2)(b) and Article 9(4)(c) of Directive 2009/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the exploitation and marketing of natural mineral waters;

2.Orders the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the costs.

(1)

OJ C 321, 11.9.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3017/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia