- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-127/19: Judgment of the General Court of 8 December 2021 — Dyson and Others v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Energy — Directive 2010/30/EU — Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 — Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners — Energy efficiency — Measurement method — Annulment by the General Court — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0127
62019TA0127
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.2.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 73/33
(Case T-127/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Non-contractual liability - Energy - Directive 2010/30/EU - Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 - Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners - Energy efficiency - Measurement method - Annulment by the General Court - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals)
(2022/C 73/38)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Dyson Ltd (Malmesbury, United Kingdom) and the other applicants whose names are listed in the annex (represented by: E. Batchelor, T. Selwyn Sharpe and M. Healy, Solicitors)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, Y. Marinova and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 268 TFEU for compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the unlawfulness of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 of 3 May 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of vacuum cleaners (OJ 2013 L 192, p. 1).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Dyson Ltd and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex shall bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
Language of the case: English.
(1)
OJ C 139, 15.4.2019