I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
10.2.2025
(Case C-419/23, (1) Nemzeti Földügyi Központ)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to property - Right of usufruct over agricultural land - National legislation extinguishing, without compensation, the rights of usufruct - Judgment establishing a failure to fulfil obligations - Reinstatement in the land register of a previously deleted right of usufruct, without examination of the lawfulness of the original registration - Finality of the original registration)
(C/2025/695)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Applicant: CN
Defendant: Nemzeti Földügyi Központ
intervening party: GW
Article 63 TFEU and Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as not precluding legislation of a Member State under which the right of usufruct created over a plot of agricultural land situated on the territory of that Member State which, after having been registered definitively in the land register, has been cancelled and deleted from that register by effect of legislation of that Member State contrary to those articles, must, at the request of the person who has been deprived of that right, be reinstated in that register, even when the original registration of that right was contrary to the applicable national legislation on the date of that registration.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/695/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—