EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-65/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 June 2015 — EF v EEAS (Civil service — Member of staff of the EEAS — Officials — 2013 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 — Applicant’s objection to the list of officials proposed for promotion — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Completion of a minimum of 2 years in the grade — Calculation of the two-year period — Date of the promotion decision)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014FA0065

62014FA0065

June 9, 2015
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

27.7.2015

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/48

(Case F-65/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)

((Civil service - Member of staff of the EEAS - Officials - 2013 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 - Applicant’s objection to the list of officials proposed for promotion - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Completion of a minimum of 2 years in the grade - Calculation of the two-year period - Date of the promotion decision))

(2015/C 245/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: EF (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the decisions refusing to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 under the 2013 promotion procedure even though he was included on the list of official eligible for promotion.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Declares that EF is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European External Action Service.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 380, 27/10/2014, p. 26.

* * *

Language of the case: French.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia