- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-417/21: Action brought on 11 July 2021 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (ITINERANT)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0417
62021TN0417
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.9.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 357/28
(Case T-417/21)
(2021/C 357/43)
Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Itinerant Show Room Srl (San Giorgio in Bosco, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Save the Duck SpA (Milan, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark ITINERANT — Application for registration No 17 946 853
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 May 2021 in Case R 1017/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to grant European Union trade mark No 17 946 853 for Classes 18 and 25;
—order [EUIPO] to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Incorrect exclusion of the evidence submitted before the Board of Appeal;
—Misapplication of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Misinterpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.