EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-576/13: Action brought on 30 October 2013 — Verus v OHIM — Joie International (MIRUS)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TN0576

62013TN0576

October 30, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

25.1.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/25

(Case T-576/13)

2014/C 24/45

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: Verus Eood (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: C. Röhl, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Joie International Co. Ltd (Hong Kong, China)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

vary the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of 23 August 2013 in Case R 715/2012-5 so that the opposition is entirely upheld and the application for Community trade mark 9599416 is rejected;

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Joie International Co. Ltd

Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘MIRUS’ for goods in Class 12 — application for Community trade mark No 9 599 416

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant

Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word mark ‘MIRUS’ for goods in Classes 12, 25 and 28

Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld

Decision of the Board of Appeal: annulment of the contested decision and rejection of the opposition

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia