I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(Case T-576/13)
2014/C 24/45
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Verus Eood (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: C. Röhl, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Joie International Co. Ltd (Hong Kong, China)
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—vary the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of 23 August 2013 in Case R 715/2012-5 so that the opposition is entirely upheld and the application for Community trade mark 9599416 is rejected;
—order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Joie International Co. Ltd
Community trade mark concerned: word mark ‘MIRUS’ for goods in Class 12 — application for Community trade mark No 9 599 416
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: German word mark ‘MIRUS’ for goods in Classes 12, 25 and 28
Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal: annulment of the contested decision and rejection of the opposition
Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.