I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
2011/C 63/56
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: X Technology Swiss GmbH (Wollerau, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Herbertz and R. Jung, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Brawn LLC (Weekhawken, United States of America)
—Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 October 2010 in Case R 1580/2009-1;
—Order the defendant to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the applicant.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant.
Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘X-Undergear’ for goods and services in Classes 23 and 25.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Brawn LLC.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: National and Community word mark ‘UNDERGEAR’ for goods in Class 25.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, since there is no likelihood of confusion between the two marks at issue.
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).