- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-82/18: Order of the General Court of 21 November 2018 — Husky CZ v EUIPO — Husky of Tostock (HUSKY) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark HUSKY — Earlier EU word and figurative marks HUSKY — Relative ground for refusal — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TB0082
62018TB0082
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.2.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 44/69
(Case T-82/18) (*)
((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark HUSKY - Earlier EU word and figurative marks HUSKY - Relative ground for refusal - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2019/C 44/91)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Husky CZ s.r.o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Husky of Tostock Ltd (Woodbridge, United Kingdom)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2018 (Case R 812/2017-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Husky of Tostock and Husky CZ.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.Husky CZ s.r.o. shall pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 134, 16.4.2018.