- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-365/07: Order of the General Court of 12 December 2011 — Traxdata France v OHIM — Ritrax (TRAXDATA, TEAM TRAXDATA) (Trade mark — Action for annulment — Applicant’s failure to proceed — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TB0365
62007TB0365
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 39/13
(Case T-365/07) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Trade mark - Action for annulment - Applicant’s failure to proceed - No need to adjudicate)
(2012/C 39/24)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Traxdata France SARL (Paris, France) (represented initially by F. Valentin, B. Amaudric du Chaffaut and G. Courtois, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Ritrax Corporation Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M.H. Blair, M.J. Gilbert, S.S. Malynicz and C.A.N. Balme, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 May 2007 (Joined Cases R 1337/2005-1, R 1338/2005-1, R 1339/2005-1 and R 1340/2005-1), concerning invalidity proceedings between Ritrax Corporation Ltd and Traxdata France SARL.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate on this action.
2.Traxdata France SARL is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 283, 24.11.2007.