- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-233/14: Action brought on 14 April 2014 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (NEXTCARD)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0233
62014TN0233
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.7.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 235/21
(Case T-233/14)
2014/C 235/28
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi, G. Ghisletti and F. Braga, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 February 2014 in Case R 1807/2013-5;
—order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned:
Word mark NEXTCARD for goods and services in Classes 9 and 36 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 3 79 931
Decision of the Examiner:
Application refused in part
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
Pleas in law:
Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009