EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-13/23, cdVet Naturprodukte: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Osnabrück (Germany) lodged on 16 January 2023 — cdVet Naturprodukte GmbH v Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LA-VES)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CN0013

62023CN0013

January 16, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

11.4.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/19

(Case C-13/23, cdVet Naturprodukte)

(2023/C 127/22)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: cdVet Naturprodukte GmbH

Defendant: Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LA-VES)

Questions referred

1.Is Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, (1) in particular Article 3(1)(a), Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 10(1)(a), (2) and (5) thereof, which provide that, in the case where no authorisation has been granted, a blanket ban on placing on the market, using and processing feed additives is to be ordered, with no account taken of the circumstances of the particular case in question, compatible with the principle of proportionality enshrined in Article 52(1) of the Charter [of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’)], in the light of the freedom to conduct a business protected by Article 16 of the Charter and the right to property provided for in Article 17(1) of the Charter?

2.In the event that the Court answers the first question in the affirmative, with the result that Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003, in particular Article 3(1)(a), Article 4(1), Article 7(1) and Article 10(1)(a), (2) and (5) thereof, is to be interpreted without restriction, does the extract used by the applicant as a feed additive, which, according to the distributor’s product specification sheet, is produced from grapefruit seeds and grapefruit peel and is described in that sheet as grapefruit seed extract (more specifically, grapefruit seed extract S), (also) constitute (in any event) the substance listed in Article 2, point 3, of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2021/758, (2) in conjunction with Part 1 of Chapter I.A of Annex I thereto, as ‘Grapefruit extract CoE 140’?

(1) Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition (OJ 2003 L 268, p. 29).

(2) Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/758 of 7 May 2021 on the status of certain products as feed additives within the scope of Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and on the withdrawal from the market of certain feed additives (OJ 2021 L 162, p. 5).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia