I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-355/13) (*)
(Competition - Abuse of a dominant position - Airport services market - Decision rejecting a complaint - Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Case dealt with by a competition authority of a Member State - Rejection of the complaint on priority grounds - Decision of the competition authority drawing conclusions, in competition law, from an investigation conducted under national legislation applicable to the sector in question - Obligation to state reasons)
(2015/C 073/32)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: easyJet Airline Co. Ltd (Luton, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Werner and R. Marian, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Biolan and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the defendant: Luchthaven Schiphol NV (Schiphol, Netherlands) (represented by: J. de Pree, G. Hakopian and S. Molin, lawyers)
Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 2727 final of 3 May 2013 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant against Luchthaven Schiphol NV in relation to alleged anti-competitive conduct in the airport services market (Case COMP/39.869 — easyJet/Schiphol).
The General Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders easyJet Airline Co. Ltd to pay the costs.
(*)
OJ C 260, 7.9.2013.