- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-505/21: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 16 December 2021 (Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du travail de Liège — Belgium) — FU v Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des Demandeurs d’Asile (Fedasil) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Asylum policy — Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) — Article 27 — Remedies against a transfer decision — Article 27 — Remedies against a transfer decision — No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CB0505
62021CB0505
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.5.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 207/8
(Case C-505/21) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Asylum policy - Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection - Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) - Article 27 - Remedies against a transfer decision - Article 27 - Remedies against a transfer decision - No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2022/C 207/11)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: FU
Defendant: Agence fédérale pour l’Accueil des demandeurs d’asile (Fedasil)
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling made by the tribunal du travail de Liège, division d’Arlon (Labour Court, Liège, Arlon Division, Belgium), by decision of 17 August 2021, is manifestly inadmissible.
(*)
Language of the case: French
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140
* * *
(1) OJ C 412, 11.10.2021.