I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-334/16 P) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - Temporary staff - Transfer of CEPOL’s seat in Bramshill (United Kingdom) to Budapest (Hungary) - Reassignment of staff - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility of the action before the Civil Service Tribunal)
(2019/C 4/30)
Language of the case: English
Appellants: FN, FB, FQ (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (represented by: initially by F. Bánfi and R. Woldhuis, and subsequently by R. Woldhuis and D. Schroeder, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2016, FN and Others v CEPOL (F-41/15 DISS II, EU:F:2016:70) seeking to have that judgment set aside.
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 11 April 2016, FN and Others v CEPOL (F-41/15 DISS II) in so far as it did not declare inadmissible the claims for annulment made by FN, FP and FQ;
2.Dismisses the claims for annulment made by FN, FP and FQ before the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-41/15 DISS II;
3.Dismisses the appeal for the remainder;
4.Orders FN, FP and FQ, on the one hand, and the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training (CEPOL), on the other hand, each to bear their own costs relating to the appeal proceedings and to the proceedings at first instance.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.