I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-221/17)
(2017/C 239/59)
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Mémora Servicios Funerarios SLU (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: C. Marí Aguilar and J. Gallego Jiménez, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Georges Chatenoud (Thiviers, France)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘MEMORAME’ – Application for registration No 12 929 071
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10/02/2017 in Case R 1308/2016-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the decision of EUIPO of 10 February 2017 in Case R 1308/2016-4 which in part granted the application for EU trade mark No 12929071 ‘MEMORAME’ and, consequently, reject in its entirety EU trade mark application No 12929071 ‘MEMORAME’;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in accordance with Article 87(2) and (3) of the Rules [of Procedure of the General Court of 2 May 1991].
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009.
—The applicant submits that the Board of Appeal of EUIPO did not properly take into account the high degree of recognition enjoyed by the earlier mark ‘MEMORA’ in the European Union.