EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-221/17: Action brought on 15 April 2017 — Mémora Servicios Funerarios v EUIPO — Chatenoud (MEMORAME)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TN0221

62017TN0221

April 15, 2017
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

24.7.2017

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/47

(Case T-221/17)

(2017/C 239/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Mémora Servicios Funerarios SLU (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: C. Marí Aguilar and J. Gallego Jiménez, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Georges Chatenoud (Thiviers, France)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘MEMORAME’ – Application for registration No 12 929 071

Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10/02/2017 in Case R 1308/2016-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of EUIPO of 10 February 2017 in Case R 1308/2016-4 which in part granted the application for EU trade mark No 12929071 ‘MEMORAME’ and, consequently, reject in its entirety EU trade mark application No 12929071 ‘MEMORAME’;

order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in accordance with Article 87(2) and (3) of the Rules [of Procedure of the General Court of 2 May 1991].

Pleas in law

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b and (5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

The applicant submits that the Board of Appeal of EUIPO did not properly take into account the high degree of recognition enjoyed by the earlier mark ‘MEMORA’ in the European Union.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia