- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-161/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Tecnifar (E-PLEX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark E-PLEX — Earlier national word mark EPILEX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62010TA0161
62010TA0161
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 204/22
(Case T-161/10)(1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark E-PLEX - Earlier national word mark EPILEX - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2011/C 204/40
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Longevity Health Products, Inc. (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Tecnifar — Industria Tecnica Farmaceutica, SA (Lisbon, Portugal)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 February 2010 (Case R 662/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Tecnifar — Industria Tecnica Farmaceutica, SA and Longevity Health Products, Inc.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Longevity Health Products, Inc. to pay the costs.
OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.